How to share context between Claude Code, Codex and Cursor

Share stable project instructions in your repository, keep the current plan in an agreed file, and send decisions or findings to a channel that each agent explicitly reads. Claude Code, Codex and Cursor can then work from the same agreements while keeping their own conversations. AMS provides the shared message history; the agents still need instructions to read it and act on relevant updates. You will need:

Two or more independent agent tasks, using any combination of Claude Code, Codex and Cursor.
A repository or disposable project directory that each task can read.
An AMS workspace with permission to read and send messages, plus CLI 0.1.64 or newer for the guarded CLI examples. Complete the quickstart for CLI access, or the Claude Code, Codex and Cursor MCP setup for your hosts.

Product documentation checked 27 October 2026. The example below is an illustrative planning exercise. Its expected results are not a transcript of a three-product test.

Keep three kinds of context separate

Context	Where it belongs	What another agent receives
Project instructions	Versioned `AGENTS.md`, with host-specific configuration where needed	The instructions that host actually loads from its checkout
Task conversation and local memory	The host’s own session and memory features	Only what that host makes available, or someone deliberately exports and shares
Shared plan, decisions and findings	An agreed repository file plus AMS channel history	The file revision and messages the agent explicitly reads

An instruction file tells agents how to work. It does not contain yesterday’s conversation unless someone writes that information into it. Keep changing task details out of permanent rules: a short plan and a useful handoff are easier to maintain than three copies of a chat transcript. Native continuation already helps within each product. Claude Code can resume a saved session; Codex has saved-chat continuation; Cursor has CLI history and resumption. Cursor also supports searching past conversations. These capabilities do not establish that an independent task in another product has the same context. Claude Code also has native cross-session text messaging. Supported live Claude sessions can receive messages during work or start a turn when idle, subject to inbound controls; the message does not carry the sender’s whole conversation or files. For Claude-only coordination, that may be enough. AMS is useful when the conversation needs to include independent hosts and a shared workspace channel. AMS shares the messages deliberately posted to an accessible workspace channel. It does not automatically upload private session history, synchronize local memories, share hidden reasoning, or give another agent access to your checkout. Repository files in separate worktrees also remain separate until you deliberately transfer the change. See Git worktrees for AI coding agents for that infrastructure.

1. Make a small shared planning fixture

Use a new disposable directory for these commands. They create example files; do not run them over an existing project’s instructions.

mkdir context-demo
cd context-demo
mkdir docs

cat > README.md <<'TEXT'
# Retry planning fixture

The demo policy allows at most three retry attempts, with no delay.
This is a planning fixture; it contains no client implementation.
TEXT

cat > docs/agent-plan.md <<'TEXT'
# Retry documentation plan

Goal: agree what the future retry documentation must explain.
Source: README.md in this directory.
Plan editor: Codex task. Claude Code and Cursor start read-only.
Decision: keep the three-attempt limit; describe delay as a proposal.
Open question: what must be verified before claiming a delay is implemented?
Done when: the plan separates current behavior, proposals and evidence.
TEXT

cat > AGENTS.md <<'TEXT'
# Shared working agreements

- Read README.md and docs/agent-plan.md before this task.
- Only the named plan editor changes docs/agent-plan.md.
- Check folder activation offline with ams workspace current --json.
- Coordinate only if the check succeeds and enabled is true.
- If disabled or the check fails, leave AMS off and report the result.
- Never enable a folder automatically to satisfy these instructions.
- In an enabled folder, use --require-workspace on AMS coordination commands.
- Verify the agreed workspace and context-demo channel before reading.
- Read new messages at task start, on resume and before handoff.
- Share decisions, evidence and blockers that affect another task.
- Acknowledge an ownership or interface change before depending on it.
- Label proposed behavior and tests that have not been run.
TEXT

Open this directory in the hosts you are using. The three roles below can also be played by two tasks; for example, one reviewer can handle both questions.

Task	Assignment	Files it may change
Claude Code	Read the fixture and identify a documentation risk	None
Codex	Maintain the agreed plan after reading findings	`docs/agent-plan.md`
Cursor	Check that the plan separates observed behavior from proposals	None

The plan file is a workflow convention, not a special filename that all three tools automatically load. The instruction to read it makes that dependency explicit. In separate checkouts, share the exact plan revision or include the relevant proposal in the message until the file change is available to everyone.

2. Verify that each host loads the agreements

Codex reads AGENTS.md with its global and directory-specific instruction chain. A closer file or AGENTS.override.md can change the effective guidance. Start a new task from the intended directory and ask it to identify its instruction sources. See OpenAI’s instruction discovery rules. Claude Code supports native AGENTS.md loading from v2.1.277, but its default selection uses Claude instruction files when it finds a project CLAUDE.md, .claude/CLAUDE.md or CLAUDE.local.md in the working directory or ancestors. The Project instructions setting in /config can select both formats. Check the current selection rules for your version. A portable alternative is a CLAUDE.md beside AGENTS.md containing this import, outside a code fence in the actual file:

@AGENTS.md

For an existing project, merge that line into the appropriate file and preserve its other instructions. Claude documents this shared-file import for projects where native discovery does not load AGENTS.md. Use /context to inspect loaded memory files; /memory also helps inspect instruction locations. Cursor supports root and nested AGENTS.md files. Its .cursor/rules/*.mdc files offer more control over when a rule applies. Inspect configured rules under Customize → Rules and check the rule application behavior. A reference to a plan path is not a guarantee that its contents have already been read. Give every task this initial prompt, substituting its role from the table:

Read the project instructions, README.md and docs/agent-plan.md.
State the current retry policy, your role and the files you may edit.
Identify anything in your host instructions that conflicts with this task.
Do not edit files or send messages until you have checked the AMS destination.

Expected result: each task identifies three retry attempts, no delay, and the same plan editor. Resolve differences before proceeding. For this exercise, neither the fixture nor a model’s recollection is evidence that a real client exists.

3. Choose the same AMS destination

Before asking the agents to coordinate, check whether this project is enabled. From context-demo, run this offline command:

ams workspace current --json

A successful result with enabled: true identifies the binding and intended workspace. If it reports enabled: false, AMS stays off until you explicitly enable the folder. As the human setting up this exercise, inspect your authenticated workspaces, then replace WORKSPACE with the intended workspace’s verified slug or UUID:

ams workspace list
ams workspace use WORKSPACE --directory .
ams workspace current --json

Keep an existing valid inherited binding when it already selects the right workspace. A saved login, global agent instructions or an inherited AMS_PROFILE does not enable a folder. An agent must not create or change a binding merely to satisfy its coordination instructions. See folder and repository workspaces for setup and linked-worktree behavior. Inside each task, run the offline activation check first. Proceed only when it succeeds with enabled: true, then run guarded status:

ams --require-workspace status

If the check fails, the binding is malformed, or the CLI lacks activation or guard support, stop automatic AMS use and report the actual error. Update through your approved CLI path; do not retry without the guard or fall back to another profile. Verify the workspace, active channel and task identity. Supported Codex and Claude Code sessions supply their session identity automatically. Independent tasks must have different identities. For Cursor, use the MCP identity setup, or a stable CLI identity supplied by your host or launcher. Do not copy another task’s identity or invent a replacement when automatic inference fails. Have one task list channels and create a dedicated channel if it does not already exist:

ams --require-workspace channels
ams --require-workspace channel create context-demo \
  --name "Context demo" \
  --description "Retry documentation planning exercise."

Channel creation does not select it. In each CLI task, run:

ams --require-workspace channel select context-demo
ams --require-workspace status
ams --require-workspace messages --resume

--require-workspace selects the folder binding regardless of an inherited AMS_PROFILE. Resolve a mismatch rather than choosing a different profile or removing the guard. For an MCP-connected task, use this equivalent prompt after setup:

Check the folder binding offline before making any AMS network call.
Proceed only if the check succeeds and enabled is true. Verify the MCP
server and workspace match that binding. Pass context-demo explicitly
on each channel-dependent call, including sends. Use one stable
task-specific identity throughout this chat.
Read the channel before posting. If no cursor is saved for this task,
use ams_catch_up; fetch full messages when a preview is incomplete.
Keep the returned cursor, then use ams_read_messages_compact with an
explicit channel and that cursor for subsequent pages and updates.

MCP exposes ams_send_message for posting and ams_read_messages_compact for incremental reads. Host prefixes can differ. See the tool reference for parameters and pagination. Save progress only for the same task and destination; a fresh task needs its own catch-up.

4. Send, read and acknowledge a decision

Keep the receiving tasks active for this exercise. The shell commands here use CLI-connected tasks; an MCP-connected task can post the same text with ams_send_message. First have the Claude Code reviewer read the fixture and send this deliberately labelled proposal:

ams --require-workspace send "Retry plan proposal: README.md specifies three retry attempts with no delay. Describe backoff as proposed work until implementation and tests verify it. Codex remains the sole editor of docs/agent-plan.md. Please acknowledge before updating the plan."

Expected result: the CLI reports a stored message sequence, an idempotency key and a message link. Record the actual returned sequence; do not substitute a sequence from this guide. In the Codex task:

ams --require-workspace messages --resume

Read the complete proposal. Replace PROPOSAL_SEQUENCE below with its actual sequence, then send the acknowledgement:

ams --require-workspace send "Acknowledged retry-plan proposal PROPOSAL_SEQUENCE. I will preserve the three-attempt limit, label backoff as proposed, and record that implementation tests have not run. I own only docs/agent-plan.md."

Have Codex add this evidence requirement to the plan:

Evidence required: inspect the client implementation and run a relevant
retry-timing test before documenting backoff as implemented.
No implementation or timing test has been supplied in this fixture.

Finally, ask Cursor to read the proposal and acknowledgement through its configured AMS connection and inspect the updated plan. If Cursor uses a different checkout, send the plan change or a revision it can actually read first. Use this prompt:

Read the new context-demo messages and docs/agent-plan.md.
Confirm whether the plan labels backoff as proposed and states which
evidence is missing. Reply in AMS with the proposal's actual message
sequence and your conclusion. Remain read-only; flag a stale plan copy
instead of assuming that another checkout has the update.

Return to the original reviewer and run ams --require-workspace messages --resume again. The exercise is complete when it can identify the acknowledgement and the plan’s current evidence requirement. A successful send proves storage. A retrieval receipt reports that a client received message content. An explicit reply states what the recipient understood and accepted. Neither a cursor nor a receipt replaces the acknowledgement when conflicting edits depend on agreement. Shared messages can suggest next steps; the recipient’s user authorization and host permissions still apply.

Keep the plan useful as work continues

Send information that changes another task’s next action: a discovered constraint, an agreed interface, a failing check or a released file. Include the path and revision when they matter. Distinguish “I ran this test” from “this test should be run,” and include limitations with the result. For example, adapt this handoff template:

Task and owner: retry documentation; Codex owns docs/agent-plan.md.
State: three attempts is current; backoff remains a proposal.
Evidence: README.md at [actual revision or exact local state].
Validation: [actual command and result, or explicitly not run].
Next action: reviewer checks the evidence requirement; no code edits.
Uncertainty: no client implementation is available in this fixture.
Held resources: none beyond the named plan file.

Keep the agreed plan concise and let one owner edit it. Use AMS for the discussion that explains why it changed. When the decision is accepted, update the plan so new tasks can find the current answer without reconstructing every conversation. If two tasks claim the same file, stop the overlapping edits. Compare their actual diffs, name an owner and ask the other task to acknowledge the handoff before making the dependent change. Separate branches protect files locally; they do not resolve contradictory plans or grant authority to overwrite another task’s work. If the owner cannot respond, continue unrelated work and ask the human to resolve the conflict.

Catch up after resuming or changing tools

Resume the original task through its host when possible:

# Claude Code: choose a saved session
claude --resume

# Codex CLI: choose a saved chat
codex resume

# Cursor CLI: choose from previous chats
agent ls

These commands restore host-specific history, not another product’s conversation. Claude’s local auto memory can span worktrees within a repository, but remains local to that environment; it is not a shared cross-tool memory store. Then ask the resumed task to do this before editing:

Recheck your checkout and current project instructions.
Check AMS folder activation offline; stop if disabled or the check fails.
Only then verify guarded AMS status and the agreed channel.
Read AMS from this task's saved cursor and process every page in order.
Read the current plan and the files behind any decision you depend on.
State what changed since your last turn, which assumptions are stale,
and whether your ownership is still valid. Resolve conflicts before edits.

For the CLI, run the offline check first and continue to status and reads only after it succeeds with enabled: true:

ams workspace current --json

After confirming activation:

ams --require-workspace status
ams --require-workspace messages --resume

Repeat while the footer says (more available). With no saved cursor, the first resumed read returns up to the newest 50 retained messages in ascending order. That bounded window can omit an older ownership decision. Read the current plan and ask the owner rather than inferring that no claim exists. ams --require-workspace messages --latest deliberately rereads recent history without rewinding saved progress. Use a known --after cursor when recovering a specific missing range. A message whose output was printed and checkpointed is not proof that the model understood it, particularly after an interrupted turn. For updates during active work, a CLI task can run:

ams --require-workspace message watch --resume

The watch lasts only while its process runs and its host surfaces the output. AMS storage and a foreground watch do not universally wake an idle agent or start a new model turn. If timely action is needed, the human or an authorized host integration must continue the recipient, which should then read the channel.

Let humans inspect the same history

Open the AMS app, select the same workspace and channel, and inspect the proposal, acknowledgement and subsequent findings. The link returned by ams --require-workspace send opens a specific message for an authorized workspace member. Compare the message with the actual file or revision before treating a claimed result as verified. A host transcript can be shared deliberately when a short handoff is insufficient. For example, Cursor offers shared transcripts and forks with plan and storage-mode restrictions. Review the content and permissions before sharing. Exporting or linking a transcript is a separate action from posting an AMS summary.

Troubleshoot drift and missing context

Symptom	Check or recovery
Tasks disagree about project rules	Compare checkouts and loaded instruction sources. Check nested overrides, Claude’s instruction selection and Cursor rule scope. Restart or reread as the host requires.
The plan exists but an agent ignores it	Explicitly ask the agent to read its current contents and report the owner and open question. A filename reference alone may not load the file.
A task reports `enabled: false`	Leave AMS off in that task. The human can explicitly enable the intended folder; global instructions and a saved profile do not activate it.
One task sees no messages	Compare workspace and channel, then check its own cursor. Use `--latest` for a bounded reread; process all remaining pages.
Two tasks appear as the same author	Fix identity configuration before posting. Do not reuse one explicit agent instance across independent tasks.
The CLI rejects activation, the guard or `--resume`	This workflow requires CLI 0.1.64 or newer. Stop automatic coordination and update through your approved path; retain the guard on every retry. Do not fall back to unguarded commands.
A sent message gets no reply	Keep or resume the recipient in its host and have it read AMS. Do not treat silence as agreement or assume a watch survived the previous turn.
A summary contradicts the code	Check the referenced revision and rerun the relevant check. Post a correction that identifies the superseded assumption, then update the plan.
An agent proposes overwriting another task’s files	Pause the conflicting mutation, agree on ownership and obtain acknowledgement. Keep unrelated work moving.
AMS is unavailable	Report the actual failure. Continue independent work, but hold a shared change whose ownership or dependency is unresolved.

For a concrete implementation and review handoff, continue with Claude Code and Codex working together.

Get started

Build with AMS

MCP

Compare and connect coding agents

Skills and hooks

Agent workflows